Management, Gender, and Race within the twenty first Century Report (Assessment)
Management or top positions in an American group are among the many fastest-growing occupations in the course of the period of the previous 20 years. Unfortunately, these occupations include jobs not historically held by African American ladies who comprise the brand new workforce. Consequently, one problem for American corporations is to include a more diverse labor force into high-status, high-skill administration roles.
In Part-I of this paper, we look at the present status of African American ladies in management, including some current modifications. We uncover potential treatments for the problems that endure, together with packages and practices currently being utilized in U.S. companies, as nicely as research instructions that will enhance our understanding of related points.
The literature on African American ladies is substantial, evidenced partially by the variety of literature reviews accomplished.
There is substantial proof that African American ladies encounter a “glass ceiling” in management. The glass ceiling is an concept popularized in the Nineteen Nineties to describe a barrier so subtle that it’s clear but so sturdy that it prevents African American ladies from transferring up within the prime positions of an organization or management hierarchy. Nowadays, girls fill almost a 3rd of all management posts, however most are stuck in jobs with little authority and comparatively low pay.
African American women do not fare any better in management in government or instructional establishments. The American authorities reported only eight.6 percent, women, in Senior Executive Service levels, with most feminine workers clustered in low-paying, non-prestigious GS 5–10 levels. In the training sector, Sandler’s 1986 findings show that “on the typical, colleges and universities nationwide make use of 1.1 senior women (dean and above) per institution” (p. 14).
Those African American women who’ve moved into administration often find reward differentials. There is proof that at higher occupational ranges, women are less satisfied with their package deal than are men (Varca, Shaffer, & McCauley, 1983). One examine of two,600 workers discovered substantial wage variations between women and men in managerial positions (Drazin & Auster, 1987); one other reported that “girls on the vice presidential levels and above earn 42 percent less than their male peers” (Nelton & Berney, 1987, p. 17). Packages of Black men in administration come closer to those of White males (Ploski & Williams, 1983).
The exodus of African American girls from corporate America is a disturbing trend generally attributed to differential treatment in management (Ellis, 1988; James, 1988; Leinster, 1988; Taylor, 1986). Women started their very own businesses at six times the rate that males did between 1974 and 1984 (Leavitt, 1988). Of the one hundred main company girls identified by a Business Week survey in 1976, almost one-third had left their company jobs for different pursuits ten years later (DeGeorge, 1987).
In the corporate life οf the United States, several cultural differences within the women belonging to Hispanic (Latina), African American, and Asian American groups affect their evaluations. And that is the main purpose behind a really short presence οf women from these communities in management. For instance, studies have demonstrated that African American males may view overweight women less negatively than their White counterparts (e.g., Harris, Walters, & Waschull, 1991), which can affect African American women’s acceptance οf greater body weights.
In addition, some researchers have discovered that, for a subset οf African American girls, weight problems, together with consuming “right” (i.e., not partaking in restrictive dieting), and interesting in stress-reducing actions, was associated with a perception οf health (e.g., Keller & Hargrove, 1992). One examine οf one hundred African American female and one hundred White female college students supplies evidence suggesting that anorexia and bulimia in African American feminine faculty students are associated with the extent οf their assimilation into mainstream culture and their acceptance οf mainstream culture beliefs οf enticing as skinny (Abrams et al., 1993). Thus, identification with African American tradition and its beliefs, somewhat than with mainstream Euro-American tradition, could additionally be a protective issue for chubby or overweight African American ladies.
The extent οf assimilation into the mainstream Euro-American culture versus identification with African American tradition seems to affect each the acceptance and internalization οf the mainstream skinny commonplace and the likelihood οf participating in restrictive, disordered weight-reduction plan behaviors (Harris, 1994; Klem, Klesges, Benet, & Mellon, 1990). Differences in acceptance οf and identification with mainstream standards and culture, socioeconomic status, in addition to particular person characteristics might affect the degree to which African American girls internalize mainstream dominant requirements for thinness and sweetness.
As famous byHarris (1994), clearly, neither African American women normally nor obese/overweight African American ladies are a homogeneous inhabitants. Many obese or chubby African American women may be content with their physical selves and should not experience any significant obesity-related health issues. Despite Harris’ (1994) finding that African American women reported larger total physique satisfaction than Euro-American ladies, Hsu (1987) suggests that restrictive consuming disturbances among African American women may be growing.
African American women who expertise significant well being issues or concerns associated to weight problems or overweight and/or who internalize the skinny ideal standard consider themselves negatively in comparability to the best and should experience body dissatisfaction and considerable private distress in regards to the management οf their weight and appearance.
Even though Terri Hansen dreamt οf at some point proudly owning her own enterprise, she all the time wanted to maintain issues simple.
“I solely wanted to have five staff,” confessed Hansen, the proprietor, and president οf four Oshkosh-based companies that employ about a hundred individuals in the Fox Valley.
After incomes her master’s degree in nursing at the University οf Wisconsin-Oshkosh in 1980, Hansen launched into an administrative profession that only bolstered her need to start a small firm.
“I ended up being the director οf nursing for 4 counties,” she said. “I had this enormous accountability but no authority to alter the things that needed to be changed.”
So at age 28, she and associate John Westphal launched Supportive HomeCare Inc. The home-based health care firm blossomed in Oshkosh so rapidly it quickly had extra clients than it might easily deal with.
Hansen purchased the company outright in 1987 and a year later began her second business, Creative Management & Marketing Resources Inc., with her friend Diane Penzenstadler.
“It was all the time our dream to begin a company collectively,” Hansen stated. “Diane’s expertise is in advertising and graphic design, so she’s the brains on the creative side. My background is extra in business management.”
By design, CMMR is provided to provide small businesses with every thing from brochures to human useful resource management.
“When you run your individual enterprise, you find yourself studying lots about belongings you don’t necessarily want to know,” Hansen stated οf her motivation in developing CMMR. “You find yourself having a lot data to share – data that would save different enterprise homeowners so much οf grief.”
The importance οf endurance is a lesson Hansen said she learned firsthand.
In 1986, the private health insurance industry stopped paying claims for residence care services, whilst Medicaid and Medicare began decreasing the quantities they were willing to pay for residence care. As a end result, Supportive HomeCare lost a large portion οf its business.
Instead οf pulling back, Hansen selected instead to launch two new businesses. One, Home Maids, established in 1992, arose from requests for cleaning services by busy professionals and different people without special medical wants, she said. The different, Supportive Home Companions, is an unlicensed company founded in 1995 in response to progressively extra stringent governmental restrictions placed upon licensed residence care providers.
“The state and federal guidelines are incredibly demanding and expensive for the house care provider, and most provide no worth to the client,” Hansen said. “For occasion, if a shopper needs to cancel her service for a day as a end result of her household is visiting, we’ve to call her doctor to get his permission to not come. Otherwise, we’re in violation οf the doctor’s orders.
“I all the time need to be very careful that I don’t enable what the federal government is doing to vary our core business philosophy,” she said. “We are right here to serve our customers, to supply high quality care at a reasonable worth.”
Hansen’s capability to overcome adversity as a small business operator was acknowledged in 1991 when Supportive HomeCare beat out 800 other nominees to win Wisconsin’s Blue Chip Enterprise Initiative contest, sponsored nationally by the united states Chamber οf Commerce and Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co. Hansen turned the primary feminine president οf the Oshkosh Chamber οf Commerce in 1994 and earned the native chamber’s top award for volunteerism the following yr.
John Casper, executive director οf the Oshkosh Chamber, said Hansen made a profound impact during and after her presidency. “She is aggressive in her method to enterprise, and when she will get involved in something, she actually pours herself into it,” Casper mentioned. “She gave οf her time and expertise in serving to the chamber elevate its commonplace and do a greater job in all areas. As a enterprise individual, her best energy is in being able to understand the demographics οf the market, then tailoring a service or product designed to fill that void.”
Hansen’s bold streak remains. She plans to broaden the list οf services now offered by her residence care firms.
“We’re looking at including a handyman service, the place someone can come over to fix a light-weight swap or weed a garden – the non-technical jobs round the house,” she said. “I had a consumer ask if we would come out and plant a garden for her, and I mentioned, ‘Absolutely. I’ll come over and do it right now if you like.’” Hansen credited her staff for a lot οf the success.
“I’ve been successful as a result of οf the standard individuals who work with me,” she mentioned, including that some οf her managers have labored along with her for 15 years. “I could depart for a month, and they may run the entire enterprise without understanding I was gone.”
That’s one οf the benefits οf having greater than five workers.
In the periods of Forties and Fifties, very few ladies have been seen in the management of American company life. In the early a long time of the twentieth century, many American households have been outfitted with the model new labor-saving home equipment that facilitated home tasks. Despite this technological assistance, many American girls faced with rising requirements of cleanliness and the society’s aim of “professionalizing” the enterprise of raising a family found themselves engrossed with the time-consuming task of running a household. Such an unalterable social disposition disabled girls from pursuing a career or some other curiosity.
They were confined to this extraordinarily slim framework of attainable social existence. However, some women of the United States had skilled a special perspective on attainable social exercise through the years of World War I, when because of the lack of workforce, women have been employed in munitions factories or tended to family farms while the men have been away. When the struggle ended, lots of them have been reluctant to surrender their jobs and return to the dreadful routine of managing a family. Ironically, society had no problem in accepting the concept of single girls working. On the other hand, married girls had been to remain homemakers and mothers.
The strain to evolve was super, and a few Canadian magazines such as Canadian Home Journal and MacLean’s professed that women who tried to work and lift a household on the identical time found true happiness solely once they left their jobs behind. The feminine identity was restricted to the centuries-old picture of a mom and a housekeeper. The best of “domestic bliss” turned out to be a prison imposed on women, who found themselves trapped in the cage of the stereotyped imaginative and prescient of a lady as incapable of turning into the rest apart from a mere housewife.
“Another Poem About the Madness of Women” by Tom Wayman and “This is a Photograph of Me” by Margaret Atwood present us with disturbing and touching pictures of women trapped in their very own houses and ladies who are in a terrible battle to recover their id as complete human beings. Tom Wayman depicts a girl demented by the repetitive work she performs in her home. Society, and even her household, are blind to her basic human want for freedom.
It is a girl whose husband and youngsters devise a treatment of her madness, which consists in her passing through a division retailer and getting out by way of the door which opens on the other side of the road. She should walk through the gang of hurrying faces and displays of merchandise, that are a metaphor for the distant and uncompassionate society which has no regard for her. This image is adopted by the depiction of the ladies in pioneer Iowa, trapped of their houses, alone all day.
All they’ll see from their windows are cornfields, “excessive as a man,” which stretched for miles round their homes. Eventually, in the isolation of their homes, they perceive the cornfields, that’s, the man-dominated world outside their dominion of house, as a “whispering and hissing” monster. The imagery of the poem brings us back to suburban America, where the girl taking out the garbage bags sees nothing however houses throughout her and perceives that there’s a woman, identical to her, in every one. Wayman precisely states the position of ladies degraded into housekeeping automatons who lead a life disadvantaged of any chance to outgrow the nightmarish framework that society imposes on them.
Margaret Atwood’s “This is a Picture of Me” expresses the writer’s notion of the place of women in society- “a small body house.” The poem seductively draws the eye from the blurry imagery to the outline of the lake in the background. All the necessary issues in the poem are revealed in a roundabout method, and, in the identical means, the truth that the speaker of the poem is drowned lurks within the brackets. This deepens the feeling of some things being left out and marginalized. Concealed behind the social surroundings lies an invisible and lifeless girl. Her image, that is, her identification, is so distorted that she turns into noticeable solely after a very lengthy time.
Women are dehumanized and dispossessed of any chance of abandoning the pattern that oppressive and exploitative male-governed society had imposed on them. Atwood’s poem is a determined search for id, which has been stripped of female individuals in patriarchal societies. The goal of this elaborate and age-long subjection of women to the mechanism of men’s vision of the world is to disable ladies from perceiving their real nature and to alienate them from the rest of society. Women have efficiently turned aside, left there hopeless and endlessly certain to the stereotype of a mother, and a housewife, which contributes to the survival of men-dominated actuality.
Since the Great Depression and with the large status of victory in World War II, the get together of presidency has been kind of in cost, controlling Congress and the organs of our tradition. It was not significantly tested until 1980, and even so, it then survived the Reagan years virtually intact. President Reagan refused to challenge it in critical areas–federal spending grew rapidly–and liberal management of Congress continued.
The Bush and Clinton administrations saw a return to liberal normalcy, and it was argued that the Reagan elections had been anomalies or merely personal victories for the old actor. It turns out, after all, that the Reagan victories reflected a broad in style revulsion on the liberal critique of America and the attitudes and program associated with it. This is why George Bush gained when he seemed to be Reagan III however lost when he seemed to abandon the cause, and why each incumbent defeated in 1994 was a Democrat.
The purpose for optimism is that fifty years of lecturing by their supposed betters have not persuaded the American people who the eternal verifies of yesteryear–household, work, and religion, and the greatness of America–are devices of repression. There is a new consensus forming that recognizes how much is misplaced when the federal government subsidizes illegitimacy, restricts religious activity, promotes radical views of male-female relationships, divides citizens based on race, or vigorously attempts to undermine the sense of a standard historical past and tradition. Both the size and power of government and the ends it so usually seeks now meet resistance and criticism unthinkable 25 years in the past.
What we are seeing is an end to the disjunction between the citizen performing as a voter and the citizen performing in non-public life. As dad and mom or children, neighbors or colleagues, employers or workers, Americans never misplaced respect for the “old” virtues.
If the citizen as a voter cast his ballot for liberal candidates, it was to deploy a security net, increase alternative, or struggle injustice. But liberal government grew beyond these limited targets decades ago, and the hole between the virtues the citizen celebrated in private life, and the goals he supported together with his vote began to develop. Now it is too giant, and the voter is utilizing his ballot to insist that government reinforce quite than subvert the virtues he cherishes in personal life.
Regaining lost ground shall be most difficult, for it is a lot easier to wreck society than to repair it. Even the strongest consensus in society and the largest majority in Washington can’t rapidly repair broken households or colleges, scale back urban crime, or lower the abortion fee, when it took decades to interrupt down the restraints and undermine the social and moral standards that once prevented the unfold of those pathologies. There might be many extra Bill Clintons: candidates who prove that La Rochefoucauld was proper in calling hypocrisy the tribute vice pays to advantage. But now that American society has begun to reassert its perception within the existence of vice and virtue alike and within the value of its personal values, traditions, and achievements, there is purpose to consider that the prospect for the nation is a good one.
For greater than a decade, the quantification οf utility loss resulting from elevated hiring οf members οf lower-performing groups has turn into an issue for each researchers and policymakers concerned with selection equity. Because the job efficiency οf minority hires is usually discovered to be, on common, decrease than the job efficiency οf majority hires (Bernardin, 1984; Campbell, Crooks, Mahoney, & Rock, 1973; Ford, Kraiger, & Schechtman, 1986; Gael & Grant, 1972; Gael, Grant, & Ritchie, 1975), our focus is on the impact οf increased minority hiring on job efficiency. Specifically, this article examines the performance loss resulting from hiring minority applicants at a rate in excess οf that is beneficial by a valid, top-down, single-list procedure (i.e., truthful in accordance with the Cleary, 1968, definition).
This may occur when organizations try to increase the group’s representation throughout the workforce or when organizations are forced by the courts to rent minorities at applicant representative rates, and even at charges in extra οf the minority illustration, to compensate for past discriminatory organizational habits (e.g., Arnold v. Ballard, 1975; Commonwealth οf Pennsylvania v. O’Neill, 1972).
Our goals don’t include arguing for or in opposition to increased minority hiring. Obviously, an organization wants to think about different components past the impression on efficiency when addressing this problem. Other components embrace the benefit to the minority group, oblique advantages οf a diversified perspective that cultural diversity supplies, and costs associated with litigation οf unfair discrimination lawsuits. These and different elements may, finally, outweigh the importance οf efficiency. However, the fee οf efficiency is an important aspect and should be explicitly quantified and built-in with different info in deciding on the appropriate level οf minority hiring.
Previous research has addressed the influence οf increased minority hiring on efficiency. The earliest analysis restricted itself to obtainable choice equity fashions and their associated ranges οf minority hiring (Hunter, Schmidt, & Rauschenberger, 1977). The outcomes from that analysis are still valuable at present, as witnessed by current references to such selection models. For example, Hartigan and Wigdor (1989) beneficial the use οf fair-selection-model adjustments to minority scores to offer equal employment alternative to able minority applicants and ready majority candidates. Although this advice can be psychometrically supported, the choice οf which οf the choice fair-selection-model changes is most acceptable is troublesome for no less than two reasons.
First, totally different definitions οf equity will yield different adjustments (e.g., Cole, 1973; Darlington, 1971; Thorndike, 1971). Second, a purely psychometrically based mostly adjustment could not handle the employer’s considerations associated to the impact on efficiency. Employers aren’t, for instance, primarily concerned with the psychometric issue οf the impression οf validity on the hiring οf minority applicants. Rather, they’re most concerned with the efficiency loss related to rising minority illustration to fulfill authorized and socially perceived ranges οf fairness.
Hunter et al.’s (1977) analysis have been helpful for quantifying performance losses inside the levels οf minority hiring really helpful by four fair-selection fashions (e.g., Thorndike’s, 1971, Constant Ratio Model). Their research illustrated the relatively low efficiency and corresponding financial utility losses related to each οf the models compared with the corresponding gain in minority representation.
Cronbach, Yalow, and Schaeffer (1980) offered knowledge crucial to this discussion. They proposed and analyzed the gains and losses related to the total continua οf minority hiring. Although their framework was helpful as a end result of it quantified expected efficiency losses as a operate οf the complete range οf minority hiring, their efficiency measure was dichotomously scaled. Their primary measure οf utility was the proportion οf “satisfactory” staff among these hired.
However, the idea οf a minimum efficiency rating discards valuable information about one’s efficiency. In addition, a efficiency cutoff level does not logically exist in most conditions. Simply because the hiring choice is dichotomous doesn’t imply that job efficiency should also be dichotomous. Cronbach et al.’s scaling οf performance had been less realistic and fewer useful for estimating efficiency loss than a continuous scaling οf performance.
In contrast with Cronbach et al. (1980), Kroeck, Barrett, and Alexander (1983) used a repeatedly scaled performance measure of their application οf the Cronbach et al. model. However, they centered on the level οf recruitment essential to increase minority hiring whereas avoiding hiring applicants beneath a specified minimum commonplace. They discovered that recruitment would have to be increased by a considerably massive, and at occasions unrealistic, issue to keep away from efficiency losses from increased minority hiring.
Abrams, K. K., Allen, L. R., & Gray, J. J. (1993). Disordered eating attitudes and behaviors, psychological adjustment, and ethnic id: A comparison οf Black and White female school students. International Journal οf Eating Disorders, 14, 49–fifty seven.
Bernardin, H. J. (1984). An analysis οf black-white variations in job performance. Paper introduced at the 44th Annual Meeting οf the Academy οf Management, Boston.
Campbell, J. T., Crooks, L. A., Mahoney, M. H., & Rock, D. A. (1973). An investigation οf sources οf bias in the prediction οf job efficiency: A six 12 months study (ETS Report PR-73-37). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Cleary, T. A. (1968). Test bias: Prediction οf grades οf Negro and white students in built-in schools. Journal οf Educational Measurement, 5, 115–124.
Cole, N. S. (1973). Bias in selection. Journal οf Educational Measurement, 10, 237–255.
Commonwealth οf Pennsylvania v. O’Neill, 348 F. Supp. 1084 (E. D. Penn. 1972).
Cronbach, L. J., Yalow, E., & Schaeffer, G. (1980). A mathematical construction for analyzing fairness in selection. Personnel Psychology, 33, 693–704.
Darlington, R. B. (1971). Another take a glance at “culture equity.”Journal οf Educational Measurement, 8, 71–82.
DeGeorge, G. (1987). Where are they now? Business Week’s main company girls of 1976. Business Week. pp. pp. 76–77.
Drazin, R., & Auster, E. R. (1987). Wage differences between women and men: Performance appraisal scores vs. wage allocation as the locus of bias. Human Resource Management, 26, 157–168.
Ellis, J. (1988). The black center class. Business Week. pp. pp. 62–70.
Ford, J. K., Kraiger, K., & Schechtman, S. L. (1986). Study οf race results in objective indices and subjective evaluations οf efficiency: A meta-analysis οf performance criteria. Psychological Bulletin, ninety nine, 330–337.
Gael, S., & Grant, D. L. (1972). Employment take a look at validation for minority and nonminority telephone firm service representatives. Journal οf Applied Psychology, 56, 135–139.
Gael, S., Grant, D. L., & Ritchie, R. J. (1975). Employment check validation for minority and nonminority telephone operators. Journal οf Applied Psychology, 60, 411–419.
Grant, D. L., & Bray, D. W. (1970). Validation οf employment exams for phone company set up and repair occupations. Journal οf Applied Psychology, fifty four, 7–14.
Greene, B. (1993). Psychotherapy with African American ladies: Integrating feminist and psychodynamic models. The Journal οf Training and Practice in Professional Psychology, 7, 49–sixty six.
Harris, M. B., Walters, L. C., & Waschull, S. (1991). Gender and ethnic variations in obesity-related behaviors and attitudes in a university pattern. Journal οf Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1545–1566.
Harris, S. M. (1994). Racial variations and predictors οf school women’s physique image attitudes. Women and Health, 21(4), 89–104.
Hartigan, J. A.Wigdor, A. K. (Eds.). (1989). Fairness in employment testing: Validity generalization, minority points, and the General Aptitude Battery. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Hsu, L. K. G. (1987). Are the eating problems becoming extra widespread in Blacks?International Journal οf Eating Disorders, 6, 113–124.
Hunter, J. E. (1983). Fairness οf the General Aptitude Test Battery: Ability differences and their impact on minority hiring charges (U.S. Employment Service Test Research Rep. No. 46)Washington, DC: Employment and Training Administration. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 237-534).
Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Rauschenberger, J. M. (1977). Fairness οf psychological tests: Implications οf 4 definitions οf selection utility and minority hiring. Journal οf Applied Psychology, sixty two, 245–260.
James, F. E. (1988). More blacks quitting white-run corporations: Many cite bias, desire to help minority corporations. The Wall Street Journal, p. 37.
Keller, C. S., & Hargrove, H. J. (1992). Factors contributing to perception οf health in younger Black girls. Perceptual Motor Skills, 75(3), 706.
Klem, M. L., Klesges, R. C., Benet, C. R., & Mellon, M. W. (1990). A psychometric study οf restraint: The impression οf race, gender, weight, and marital standing. Addictive Behaviors, 15, 147–152.
Kroeck, K. G., Barrett, G. V., & Alexander, R. A. (1983). Imposed quotas and personnel choice: A computer simulation study. Journal οf Applied Psychology, sixty eight, 123–136.
Leavitt, J. A. (1988). Women in administration and administration: An information sourcebook. New York: Oryx Press.
Leinster, C. (1988). Black executives: How they’re doing. Fortune. pp. pp. 109–120.
McNair, L. D. (1992). African American ladies in remedy: An Afrocentric and feminist synthesis. Women and Therapy, 12, 5–19.
Nelton, S., & Berney, K. (1987). Women: The second wave. Nation’s Business. pp. pp. 18–27.
Ploski, H. A., & Williams, J. (1983). The Negro almanac: A reference work on the Afro-American. New York: Wiley.
Rowe, D. M., & Grills, C. (1993). African-centered drug remedy: An different conceptual paradigm for drug counseling with African American shoppers. Journal οf Psychoactive Drugs, 25, 21–33.
Sampson, E. E. (1993). Identity politics: Challenges to psychology’s understanding. American Psychologist, 48(12), 1219–1230.
Sandler, B. R. (1986). The campus climate revisited: Chilly for ladies school, directors, and graduate students. Washington, DC: The Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.
Schmidt, F. L., Pearlman, K., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). The validity and equity οf employment and educational exams for Hispanic Americans: A evaluate and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 33, 705–724.
Stevenson, H. C., & Renard, G. (1993). Trusting ole’ clever owls: Therapeutic use οf cultural strengths in African American households. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24(4), 433–442.
Taylor, A., III. (1986). Why women managers are bailing out. Fortune. pp. pp. 16–23.
Taylor, J., & Jackson, B. (1991a). Factors affecting alcohol consumption in Black ladies. Part I. The International Journal οf the Addictions, 25(11), 1287–1300.
Taylor, J., & Jackson, B. (1991b). Factors affecting alcohol consumption in Black girls. Part II. The International Journal οf the Addictions, 25(12), 1415–1427.
Thorndike, R. L. (1971). Concepts οf culture-fairness. Journal οf Educational Measurement, 8, 63–70.
Varca, P., Shaffer, G. S., & McCauley, C. D. (1983). Sex differences in job satisfaction revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 348–353.