Male Teachers. Gender and Schooling. Research Paper

Male Teachers. Gender and Schooling. Research Paper


Nobody can deny the fact, that school performs an important function not solely in children’s education, but in addition of their character and outlook forming. It is necessary that children be taught concerning the norms of society they are alleged to comply with as women and men. This is as a end result of gender is defined by the society and due to this fact because the boys are growing up they need some tips on tips on how to reside and behave as the society expects. Most of the time these boys are in school and it is during their early years in life that they get to study their gender roles.


It is supposed that “boys in particular want robust, charismatic lecturers who mix agency discipline with a good-natured acceptance of boyish energy” (Mills, 2004). It is supposed that such trainer have to be a man solely. And the potential resolution is to contain extra male academics in faculties hence providing boys with male function fashions. So the aim of this research is to search out out if boys really want male major school lecturers as position fashions. This is a really fascinating drawback to discover because of the changing gender roles which brings lots of conflicts in relation to gender stability. There has for long been silence on the problems of gender, this downside is not referred openly. This approach has adverse consequences for the present gender relations in faculties.

The time period gender can be used to explain the socially prescribed roles and relationships between men and women. “Gender is all the time lived in the modalities of ethnicity and sophistication, nationality in the modalities of gender and race, and class within the modalities of gender and nationality” (Prins, 2006). Every society has its gender norms which assist to assign specific duties and entitlement to men and women.

In latest years, there was the necessity for gender fairness, so the presence of male lecturers in major faculties is considered to be an affordable strategy so as to help in attempting to achieve gender equity and is an attempt to demystify the notion that learning and teaching is a girls’ factor. Teaching and especially in main and elementary faculty is taken into account as a ‘woman’s’ work. This is the perception that’s held by most people and thus the presence of male lecturers in the faculty may help to reduce back the myth that is associated with faculty among the boys. There is a lot of concern when it comes to teaching; that is how the individuals are socialized. So if the boys are informed that there’s nothing wrong in instructing and learning then it’ll go a long way in making an attempt to achieve gender fairness within the society. (Davies, 2003)

This is at school the place the boys get their first hand experiences about life outside the home. It is considered by many students that one of many issues our system of training faces at present is so called “feminization” of faculty. This strategy implies that that there’s a sort of “feminist conspiracy in opposition to boys” in colleges, and male lecturers usually are not welcomed also. So the Queensland’s Male Teachers’ Strategy suggests some reasons for why there are so few males in educating.

There is a stereotype that instructing is not a “masculine profession”. But the main reason for this is low wage. Still “the upper echelons of the profession are crammed by men”. The standing of the profession may be improved via greater pay ranges.

According to the newest analysis conducted in Queensland the number of male academics in schools is just about 28%, and it’s continually decreasing. So a new strategic plan was developed so as to appeal to and retain male lecturers. (Mills, 2004).

There is a wide-spread notion that this so-called “feminization” may have negative affect upon the training of boys. It can be acknowledged, that there’s an pressing have to re-masculinize colleges to have the ability to make them extra ‘boy-friendly’.

This suggestion gives us the idea that a “charismatic teacher” should be a man solely, and female lecturers appear to be a deficit:”Women are seen as downside and males as the solution”. The concept of a male trainer as a task model ultimately denies women’s pedagogical expertise.

What is extra, male figures are seen as the disciplinarians within the society. This means that the society has sure expectations in regards to the faculties. There is the myth that fathers or the male figures in the society are imagined to discipline the children. These myths have been carried ahead to the faculties.

Our society has idealized the nuclear family and the children who’re brought up by single moms are shunned by the society. This due to this fact results in the concept that male teachers would act as function models to the children who lack fatherly advice. That is the society has valued the daddy determine so much that the absence of a father makes the society to wish to replace or have a substitute who will lead the students. This is additional linked to underneath achievement in class for the boys. These are the myths that are related to educating and studying. In a society that has lots of children who’re introduced up by single father or mother and largely mothers, a male primary faculty instructor is the closest function mannequin that these boys have (Lingard, 2002).

As Mills states, “for many mythopoets, the pressures confronting boys could be avoided if there have been males involved in their upbringing”. It presupposes that male academics play a father-like position to children, the main purpose of which is to discipline them. It means that and not using a firm male hand the kids are uncontrollable. This concept valorizes masculine domination in families and in class. The mail teachers are in such a means supposed to possess “natural” disciplining skills. This method results in implication that feminine academics are deficit. At the same time, to find a way to present their “manliness” some male academics are apt to put-down to boys. These actions are treated as something compatible with masculinity.

Of course some children might be taught better from some male teachers. But the query of discipline in a class just isn’t solely a question of teacher’s gender (Lingard, 2002).

The society has made the educational institutions to appear as feminine. This is as a result of the curriculum appears female in nature and the dearth of male lecturers at school further mystifies this notion. It is acknowledged, that boys normally view studying as female, as a end result of they’re usually taught by feminine academics at school. This in turn makes studying actions feminine within the view of the boys and most of the time they’re assisted by their mums with their school work since they’ve been socialized to have a male determine round. Therefore the provision of male teachers in class would assist to increase the achievement of boys in major faculty. Gender balance in schools is important in a society that desires to attain gender stability. If this case is reflected in colleges it’ll assist the society at massive to cope with gender issues. If the boys learn about gender balance early in life, that’s, throughout the first school years they will switch this information to the society. The boys are able to know via their position model that they don’t lose their id by being at school. Masculinity or femininity just isn’t defined by what an individual does however somewhat who he/she is. The male main faculty lecturers present the boys that anybody can train and educating and learning just isn’t for girls and ladies respectively. (Davies, 2003).

As for “boys’ energy”, many academics state that they spend more time coping with self-discipline than educating, and that boys are the principle focus of disciplinary motion. This is as a end result of boys’ loud, bodily disruptive and aggressive behaviour needs to be addressed earlier than studying can occur”. (Gender Equity)

As observed by Abbott (2005) boys need male lecturers as their role fashions as they help to reduce discipline circumstances in colleges. This is an example of “boys will always be boys” method to the problem, when college is meant to worth such essentialized masculine behaviours.

Still there is some evidence proving that boys are probably to misbehave extra usually for female lecturers. Jone (1985) signifies that some feminine academics complain concerning the habits of the boys in the course of the female teachers. In the DEST research carried out in a small rural faculty some feminine lecturers expressed their concern about the issue of boys’ behaviours. Observations showed that indeed boys are likely to be more disruptive with girls. “This will typically entail requiring boys to consider the influence of gender ideas, and extra particularly their understanding of masculinity, on their perspective and behaviour. Such an strategy is seldom taken up by male teachers” (Mills, 2004). While as it is true that any trainer can preserve self-discipline in class, the society has socialized the boys to view the male instructor as the disciplinarian. For a society to achieve gender balance, these myths must be demystified. They have to begin from the society, that is, the quick family. For example the disciplinarian can both be the father or the mother. This notion shall be transferred to the varsity setting the place every instructor shall be given the suitable respect and treatment that he/she deserves.

Gender and sexuality are very complicated issues. Sexuality is advanced and the boys tend to really feel that the male academics have some first hand experience. “Self is constituted inside relations of management and is deeply embedded inside systems of information and discourse. This is a crucial growth, one which has contributed to new instructions in the study of identities related to gender and sexuality” (Callero, 2005). It is considered, that the male academics can provide them some consolation and show the means to behave and accept their sexuality.

But there are some facts, that show that males in school aren’t all the time a bonus.

Numerous researches prove that when men educate boys they’re likely to collude with boys in order to preserve present relations of energy. Some male academics are abusive to boys.

Some attempts are in progress to improve the scenario. Schools revise the varsity curriculum, since the society views the curriculum as feminine, that is in flip attributed to the under achievement of the boys. Certain areas of schooling where under achievement for boys are famous include: listening, talking, writing and studying. The curriculum should incorporate the curiosity of the boys within the college curriculum.

“While it’s well established that certain transformative politics are imperative to pursuing the objectives of gender justice, an affirmative agenda, characteristic of large-scale initiatives, such as Success for Boys, has clearly been best in steering present gender equity policy instructions in Australia.” The academic needs of schoolboys proceed to be addressed; it goals at creating boy-friendly curriculum and establishing positive relationship with boys. (Keedle, 2005).

The under achievement that is today noted with the boys would cut back as a outcome of the boys may have something that’s attention-grabbing and it will keep them in class. This along with the presence of the male academics will assist to model the boys. ( Mills shows how some school-based programs which might be dealing with “the social building of masculinities” have some positive influence on boys in relation to relationships with the opposite kids and violence. It is proven that some boys whose behaviour doesn’t correspond to the dominant fashion of being masculine face with homophobia. “Masculinity tends to be outlined as that which is not female, however femininity isn’t outlined as that which isn’t masculine […]. To be like a lady is far worse than to be like a boy – in order that to accuse a boy of being girl-like has far more unfavorable weight than to accuse a lady of being boy-like.” But nowadays a lot of stereotypes shift. Sociologists demonstrated the variability of sexual meanings, identities, and classes; many shifted their focal point from “the homosexual’ as a onerous and fast, natural, universal sort of being to homosexual as a social class that “ought to itself be analyzed and its relative historic, financial, and political base be scrutinized’ (Conell, 2005).

It is no doubt that socialization is a crucial concept in each society because it helps to situation the youngsters as they grow up. This is what helps to outline masculinity and femininity. It helps to define how girls and boys understand one another and the society at giant. But it isn’t compulsory that boys have male lecturers as their function fashions. But nonetheless males can and should take part in schooling of the youngsters, both girls and boys. The benefits for boys having extra males of their lives are doubtful, but males should take responsibility for welfare of youngsters.

Teachers must be taught more about gender. “While there had been some skilled improvement focus within the Case Study Schools on these matters, at instances there was an absence of awareness of probably the most current analysis and principle concerning the subject. The most effective approaches look like those that combine such a focus with a stress upon enhancing teachers’ pedagogical repertories” (Lingard, 1997).The dominant notions of masculinity and femininity should be changed. Nowadays we see that in our society poverty, suicide charges, violence in families turn into even worse. All these components make the need for gender training much more pressing. So being a optimistic function mannequin doesn’t depend upon gender, however totally on schooling and instructing skills.


Abbott, Wallace. (2005), Sexuality in “Introduction to sociology: feminist perspectives. New York: Routledge.

Callero, P. L. (2003). The Sociology of the Self. Annual Review of Sociology. vol.29 115-132.

Connell, R.W. (2005).‘The Social Organization of Masculinity’, Masculinities (2nd edition, pp.67-86), University of California Press: Los Angeles.

Collins, Patricia Hill.1990. Black Feminist Thought, New York: Harper Collins.

Corbertt, Grecille J. 1991. Gender, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Davis, Angela. 1981. Women, Race and Class. New York: Random House

Davies, B. (2003)‘Becoming Male or Female’, Frogs and snails and Feminist Tales: Preschool Children and Gender (pp1-22).Hampton Press: New Jersey.

Doane, Mary Anna. 1987. The Desire to Desire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Gender Equity: A framework for Australian Schools (1997). pp.23-73.

Grant, Judith. 1993. Fundamental Feminism, New York: Routledge.

Jackson, A.Y. (2004) ‘Performativity Identified’, Qualitative Inquiry, 10(5):673-690.

Martino, W. (1999)”Cool Boys’, ‘Party Animals’,’Squids’and’Poofters’: Interrogating the Dynamics and Politics of Adolescent Masculinities in School’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2):239-263.

Keddle, Amanda (2005). Gender, masculinities and schooling. Redress. pp.23-29.

Lingard, B. et al. (2002) Research Report Addressing the Educational Needs of Boys. The University of Quensland.

Mills, M. et al. (2004) Attracting, recruiting and retaining male academics: coverage issues in the male trainer debate. British Journal of Sociology of Education. vol. 25, no 3, pp.356-369.

Prins, B. (2006) Narrative Accounts of Origins: A Blind Spot within the Intersectional Approach? European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. thirteen, no. 277, pp.278-290.

West, C and Zimmermann (1987)‘Doing Gender’, Gender & Society, 1(2):125-151.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *