example of mother tongue and how i relate to the writer essay

Example Of Mother Tongue and How I Relate to the Writer Essay

I was fourteen when I first heard of the “ F” word. I was walking down the street to a friend’ s house when a man standing by the corner suddenly said it to my face. This happened in the UK where I was taking up an English course. I did not know what the word meant, but by his facial expression I knew that it was nothing good. At this time, I was just starting to learn English, and the word did not appear in the textbooks. I learned later that day what it when I talked to an English friend about it, and it made me so upset. I did not deserve such a spiteful word especially from someone I have not done anything wrong to. Yet I must admit that this negative experience was not the only reason I have for learning English.

Based on my bad encounter with an English stranger, I believe that English should be globalized. The language is no longer exclusive for the white or those who have money to roam the world. English is for everyone, and should serve as an instrument for comprehension and cooperation of all races. I wanted to get rid of my accent and be able to speak English the English way. I was ashamed of how I sounded; it made me feel like I did not belong. I wanted to own English, and I thought that the only way to do it was to not sound like me.

After I read Amy Tan’ s “ Mother Tongue, ” I realized I was wrong. I should not be embarrassed of myself for thinking that way about my native tongue. I suppose this was exactly the writer’ s purpose for writing the text – to enlighten everyone to the point that native accents are only a reflection of where someone came from, of the place they first saw the light of the sun, of where someone’ s character founded from. Hence, there is no reason the native tongue should be just thrown away. The text responds to situations where there is discrimination and stereotyping based on ethnicity. This paper seeks to prove that telling true-to-life stories is one of the best ways to convey an important message to the audience. It provides details about the writer, and an analysis of her audience, arguments, and methods of rhetoric.

The writer of the text is Amy Tan. She was born in California of Chinese immigrant parents. Tan is not an English scholar, but she writes English novels and has always loved the language (Academy of Achievement, “ Amy Tan Biography” ). Her most popular work was the “ Joy Luck Club”, which centers on a mother-daughter conflict. When she was still attending school, Tan showed determination to elude general expectation of Asian students by changing her major to English (Tan 7). She also decided to become a freelance writer despite discouragement from her boss that she was not qualified. Tan received her graduate degrees in English and Linguistics at San Jose State University, and studied for a doctorate in Linguistics at Berkeley before she accepted a language development consultancy position at the Alameda County Association for Retarded Citizens and managed a training program with regard to developmentally disabled children (Academy of Achievement, “ Amy Suntan Biography” ).

It has in no way been easy for Suntan to establish her credibility in the field of English. Because she does not look American at all, she has received taunting from the other kids in school, and was stereotyped by teachers. She was even underrated for her potential to become an English writer. Suntan pursued to convince the people around her that ethnicity had nothing to do with what is inside her, of what she will be capable of. She defied the usual by excelling in English instead of focusing on Math and Science like most other Asian did (Tan 7). She wrote English novels and become a best-selling author. From Tan’ h achievement of making a name with regard to herself in the literary world, she undoubtedly managed to generate a right to use ethos because as already mentioned, ‘ Amy Tan’ will be already a credible name. She used this to her advantage and described the nature of her work to her readers.

Tan’ s attitude toward the subject of native tongue however is a mix of regret and expectation. There was feel dissapointed about because of her prior relationship with her mother, of how she indirectly underestimated her mother’ s intelligence by speaking in the girl behalf even whenever not asked in order to do so. With this problem, Tan also thought that all her mother’ t native accent associated with obliterated the significance of what the girl had got in order to say. And after that right now there was anticipation that will after reading the written text, more people will begin to respect diversity. Color hoped that the girl writing could assist the entire world realize that will neither the chinese language neither the mother language is enough associated with a reason in order to discriminate anyone. This particular of course is definitely pathos or psychological cues because because she recalls the girl past, the visitors are also reminded associated with certain memories within their own recent and are in a position to connect to the particular writing because these people believe that Color understands how these people feel.

The primary audience consists of those who came through a non-English history and who desire to engage within English-related careers like as writing, training, or consulting nevertheless feel dispirited simply by their limited British and the stereotyping from the society. The particular text can also be specifically dedicated to the girl mother, since Color mentioned in the particular text that “ she knew the girl had succeeded within where it measured when her mom finished reading the girl book and informed her it turned out therefore easy to study (Tan 8). ” Moreover, the textual content is intended in order to convince schools plus educators to help their students within pursuing courses that will they objectively think their students may excel on. The particular same goes in order to those whose everyday life involved working with people through different ethnicities – that they ought to learn how to accept that will each person is exclusive, and that the particular language is certainly not a way of measuring character plus intellect. This once again uses pathos considering that it targets individuals who are unstable of pursuing their particular dreams and targets due to the judgment associated with people around all of them. The encouragement Brown gives provides psychological support. However, reality that the articles are partly for Tan’ s mother is really a manifestation of pathos.

Secondary market consist of those people who like the functions of Amy Brown, and who want to understand her further simply by reading her lifetime story as well as other text messages. Also courted since secondary readers are usually those who are usually inspired by the girl life and achievement, and who require to learn about how exactly she became a good English novelist regardless of being born associated with Chinese parents who also do not talk fluent English. These types of are folks who Brown did not plan to influence by this particular text, but are usually compelled to read through her writings mainly because of her impact in them. By mere fact that will the secondary market reads Tan’ ersus work because associated with her previous articles, this means that will the audience is convinced that Amy Brown is credible which usually means the rhetorical tool used can be ethos.

According to the textual content, people unconsciously talk different languages, that are used by other people as basis to get judging intellect. Brown believed that the girl mother’ s British “ reflected the particular quality of exactly what she had in order to say (8). ” Hence, with the particular intention of conserving her mother plus herself in the unpleasantness, Tan caused it to be the habit to endure in her mother’ s place when talking to people in department stores, banks, hospitals, and restaurants. She realized later on that broken English did not necessarily make her mother less intelligent. Tan supported this argument by telling about the way her mother advised her and her husband to “ not waste money that way (7). ” The writer also told about how her teachers insisted that a course in English was not a good choice for someone like her; that she was not American enough to become proficient in the language. But while Tan has never considered herself an expert, she proved everybody else wrong, by becoming one of most admired English writers of today.

Tan began to “ write stories using all the Englishes she grew up with (396). ” It was while delivering a talk about her book “ The Joy Luck Club” that Tan noticed she was speaking in a language she has not used with her mother before. It was in fact her prejudice of her mother’ s tongue that motivated her to become a writer, and made her understand that it was not right to undermine people who do not talk the same language that you do. This was another argument that Tan was able to present in the text. Just because one does not sound like you do, it does not already indicate that the person is inferior to you. Similarly, being able to speak English fluently does not necessarily make one more of a person than others. This again uses the rhetorical tool pathos given that Tan engaged the audience through her sentiment she experienced of her mother.

The text is an individual narrative since it mostly talks about the true-to-life-experience of author. However, it is also argumentative in the sense that it attempts to make the target audience believe in an idea which not everyone accepts mainly because right. The concept of ethnic equality has not yet come to a point of being universally practiced. But yes, I agree that the text will be effective in communicating the main point to the target audience. I do not think the author required to cite some other scholarly works to prove her have. While her message is not fresh, her use of personal anecdotes makes it appear like it is something individuals have not heard of before.

In the text, Amy Tan conveys three methods of rhetoric: ethos, logos, and pathos. For ethos, the writer offers a description of her profession, which determines her credibility like a writer. For logos, she tells exactly how her mother proved that she completely knows what she is talking about actually when her English does not noise very good. Hence, people like her must be treated because if they were unintelligent. Lastly, pathos will be demonstrated as the girl talks about exactly how her mother battled with broken English. It draws sympathy from the target audience, and brings a realization that people who usually do not speak good English ought to not be discriminated against.

Works Cited

Academy of Achievement. “ Amy Tan Biography. ” 1996. Web. 28 January 2014.
Tan, Amy. “ Mother Tongue. ” The Threepenny Review 43 (Autumn, 1990): 7-8. Web. 28 January 2014.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *