essay on integrating leadership and communication styles

Essay On Integrating Leadership and Communication Styles

Integrating Leadership and Communication Styles

Integrating Leadership and Communication Styles
Leadership is a crucial concept in organizations as well as team building. Whereas some people are born leaders, others have to work on it. Without a leadership, teams as well as organizations are likely to achieve little as far as their goals and objectives are concerned. In fact , leadership is one of the most important resources in any given organization (Iqbal, 2011). It is argued that leadership and communication go hand-in-hand in the sense they influence the general performance of an organization.

Authoritarian leadership is a leadership style where a single individual has full control of all decisions making, and little contribution from the other members of the group. This means that autocratic leaders rarely allow views of the followers, and always their decisions are based on personal ideas and judgments (Kippenberger, 2002). As such, this leadership entails supreme dictatorial control over a group. Democratic leadership, also referred to as participative leadership, is described as a leadership style that allows group members to be part of the decision-making process. On the other hand, laissez faire leadership, also known as delegative leadership, the leader hands-off and gives the members of the group to make decisions (Iqbal, 2011).

The above leadership styles affect productivity in an organization in various ways. For instance, authoritative leadership is associated with low organization productivity because of the relationship between the leader and the group members. Leader is entitled to any or all decision making, plus members are not really allowed to provide any contributions. Consequently, the group people are less inspired, which contributes in order to less productivity (Kippenberger, 2002). Such is usually the case regarding laissez faire management. However, less efficiency in laissez accomplir is not since of insufficient involvement in the decision-making process, but instead since the group people possess the freedom in order to do what they wish plus the way the particular want it completed. Consequently , there is usually a lack associated with enough supervisions plus monitoring to advertise high productivity (Zaccaro & Klimoski, 2011). Nevertheless, democratic management appears to become the very best leadership whenever it comes in order to enhancing productivity. Even though the members are usually allowed to take part in the decision-making procedure, the leader offers control on exactly how they implement this kind of decisions. Therefore, this particular leadership is related with high company productivity, unlike the particular authoritative and laissez-faire leadership styles (Austin, 2012).

There are significant variations on the conversation style between the particular three leadership typologies. Authoritative leadership encourages a top-down management style. Since the market leaders make all of the choices, the group people work on the particular instructions of the particular leader (Ricketts, 2011). Therefore, communication seems to be a good one way flow, through the bottom to top. Laissez faire has a tendency to prefer a bottom-top type of communication design. The group people act based upon the decisions earning and not upon the ones provided by their head. As such conversation has a tendency to follow the particular bottom-top channels (Bertocci, 2009). Within the additional democratic leadership improves a top-bottom-top communication style. This means that information flows from the top management to the group members, and then back to the top. This kind of leadership allows connection between management and the group users. Therefore, information moves freely from the top to the bottom and back to the top (Iqbal, 2011).

In conclusion, authoritative, laissez-faire, and democratic leadership styles possess varying impacts on the productivity of an organization. Whereas authoritative and laissez-faire leadership styles are associated with low productivity; democratic management is known to enhance high productivity. This difference is really as a result of the manner, in which the leader and the members socialize, especially in the decision-making process.


Austin, M. M. (2012). Human being services management: Organizational leadership in sociable work practice. New York: Columbia University or college Press.
Bertocci, D. I. (2009). Leadership in companies: There is a difference between market leaders and managers. Lanham, Md: University Press of America.
Iqbal, T. (2011). The impact of leadership styles on organizational effectiveness: Conditional study of selected organizations in IT sector in Karachi. Munich: Grin Verlag.
Kippenberger, Capital t. (2002). Leadership Styles. Chichester: Capstone Bar.
Ricketts, D. (2011). Leadership: Individual development and career success. Clifton Park, NY: Delmar.
Zaccaro, S. M., & Klimoski, L. J. (2011). The nature of organizational management: Understanding the overall performance imperatives confronting today' s leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.