Character Analysis of Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet” Essay (Critical Writing)
The story of Romeo and Juliet is presumably essentially the most fantastically constructed show of ideological love the world knows at present. Ideological as a result of it is the essence of a type of love not recognized to fashionable man. Richly woven within the prejudices and social conflicts of the late Renaissance era, it displays popular misconceptions of what love actually is. Several tales of similar context have been made and reworked over time, similar to Tristan and Isolde and the cult-movie West Side Story, and though there could be debate as to what type of the story got here first, Romeo and Juliet is basically accepted as the epitome of love-tragedy. Looking more closely on the character of Romeo, we have to ask though: what type of particular person was a
He and why did he fit the profile of the condemned lover so well? To analyze his character, it is necessary to know the Italy into which he was born.
Written within the 1500’s, William Shakespeare explored as a lot the Renaissance city as he did the characters. The Renaissance (re-awakening or re-birth) was indicative of a new faculty of thought, a time when all ethical obligations and beforehand Dark-Age ideas had been being irreconcilably challenged. The Renaissance in Italy was a time in which historians and writers were most energetic, sparking a new wave of literacy in the Italian world, mentioned to be the father of Renaissance Europe.
Literature was beginning to be written in the vernacular as opposed to the high-Latin, which often had eradicated odd folks from writing because of the social standing surrounding those who wrote in Latin (Hutchinson, 2006). It stands to purpose thus that old social values on the time were additionally challenged. For instance, in the case of castes and social class limitations as seen in Romeo and Juliet, extra emphasis was being positioned on the worth of the ‘common’ particular person than had previously been explored. Looking at Romeo as a personality, his obvious insistence on flouting the norms of social apply reflected the rebellious nature of the Italy he was born into, the Italy of Renaissance thought-freedom.
Questionable on this story, however, is whether or not or not Romeo’s supply of affection was true, or based on lust-driven infatuation. When considering firstly the fact that Romeo had been in love with Rosaline previous to his meeting Juliet, this sheds a shadow of doubt upon his true intentions with Juliet. In Act I Scene I we already see the Capulet-Montague squabble breaking out as Benvolio, Romeo’s good friend and Tybalt, Lady Capulet’s nephew decide to make war in the public streets, which appears to be not an unusual scene. The scene of pressure already draws the eye to the true state of affairs of conflict between the families. Also in Act I Scene I, we see a melodramatic Romeo lamenting his love for Rosaline:
“Alas, that love, whose view is muffled nonetheless,
Should, without eyes, see pathways to his will!
Where shall we dine?” (Romeo, Act I Scene I).
In impact, Romeo is type of selfish, his actions are about himself and this doesn’t bode nicely for the futures of anybody involved with him. His actions are hasty, with out much thought given to what the results of his actions will be. It might be postulated that his love either for Rosaline or for Juliet could not be terribly practical. As he marries Juliet, they have not recognized each other long, however quite caught up within the impulses of attraction, Romeo decides that to marry Juliet before she can be compelled to marry Paris would be the answer to the problem.
Yet in Act I Scene IV, Romeo is invited to a dinner which Rosaline shall be attending, so infatuated with the thought of Rosaline, it’s Juliet who catches his eye, placing a good quantity of doubt on his true feelings for Rosaline within the first place. After having wooed Juliet with the usual affectations, he discovers she is a Capulet and once more the eye is drawn to the horrible woes of his life:
“Is she a Capulet?
O expensive account! my life is my foe’s debt.” (Romeo to Benvolio, Act I Scene V).
Comparing as an example, Romeo’s character to that of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, it can be seen that a lot of Shakespeare’s males have been somewhat egocentric in nature. Where Romeo is intent on getting what he desires, regardless of the circumstances or consequences, Hamlet goes forth and loses everybody that’s precious to him with the exception of Horatio in a egocentric tirade towards his step-father. Romeo also makes conjectures that he has not thought about, wishing in Act II Scene II, that he could change his name and now not be a Montague, additionally stating:
“I actually have night’s cloak to hide me from their sight;
And however thou love me, let them find me here:
My life have been higher ended by their hate,
Than death prorogued, wanting of thy love.” (Romeo to Juliet, Act II Scene II)
This just isn’t solely foolish, but full of the carefree nature of youth, Romeo is not thinking about the larger picture, but roughly about what he desires from Juliet. Bearing in thoughts that he met Juliet the night time before, there is not a lot logical change that he is actually ‘in love’, but extra infatuated with the gorgeous Capulet when solely the evening earlier than he was harping the same professions of Rosaline.
As a personality, Romeo is somewhat scattered. He strikes the reader as being full of idea’s about love and romance and although clearly pushed by these emotions, he does not stop to assume that the consequences may be grave for his actions. Juliet is incapacitated by the same emotions of youth, which make the scenario volatile. Romeo had had a dream which had posed itself as an omen surrounding this particular event, but as a substitute of seeing it as a warning, his emotional entanglement with Juliet rules above the logic of his mind.
He not only puts himself in danger, but also his different loved ones or Juliet’s. This is with specific reference to his murder of Mercutio, which put Juliet in a very difficult situation of having to determine on between Romeo and her household. Romeo isn’t in precise reality the kind of one that is worthy of as much acclaim as he has been given. His actions, together with these of Juliet, have been romanticized over time. Although his flouting of social norms of the interval could have questioned the harshness of social realities, the non-public meaning of his actions had been devastating and within the end…tragic.
Hutchinson’s Encyclopaedia of World History. 2006. “Renaissance”. Web.
Shakespeare, William. “Romeo and Juliet”. Shakespeare’s Homepage. Web.