Accreditation and Quality Tools for Patient Safety Proposal
Health service accreditation programs are crucial for the sphere of healthcare since they prove that facilities ensure patient quality and safety. To be able to obtain accreditation, hospitals have to pass regular assessments which are meant to identify if they operate rigorously and consistently. Unfortunately, the bond between accreditation and patient safety have not received sufficient attention yet. The proposed research will fill this gap, making professionals realise how they are able to benefit their clients.
In america, healthcare facilities usually select from two organisations which have the right to accredit them: The Joint Commission (TJC) and Det Norske Veritas (DNV). In nearly all cases, they prefer TJC since it started operating in the last century and contains already proved is authoritativeness. Actually, it serves a lot more than 4,000 hospitals currently (Nussman, 2014). DNV, however, was created just a decade ago. It represents a bit more than 350 facilities (Nussman, 2014). Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation provides hospitals with numerous benefits. Probably the most critical one is that JCI emphasises their capability to provide high-quality care and plays a part in client satisfaction (“Great things about JCI,” 2017). Patients become confident that the facility is on its way to reach excellence in performance, to allow them to have the required support.
Accreditation also has an possibility to reduce risks and costs in healthcare. To be able to obtain it, hospitals face the need to boost their performance and make sure that all their operations work and efficient (Smith, Supachutikul, & Mate, 2014). Thus, it really is significant for facilities to recognize possible risks also to make changes offering a chance to minimalize them. For example, by implementing strategies had a need to deal with the chance of patient falls, hospitals will donate to their clients’ safety aswell.
With the improvement of the grade of services, facilities get yourself a chance to keep your charges down significantly (Brubakk, Vist, Bukholm, Barach, & Tjomsland, 2015). If professionals identify medical issues timely and offer appropriate treatment, they are able to avoid the usage of additional tests and drugs that allows saving cash for both hospitals and patients. In this manner, it is also vital that you develop appropriate health service planning, which can’t be achieved without efficient cooperation between healthcare professionals (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in HEALTHCARE, 2017). Obviously, the eye ought to be paid to patients aswell. Thus, the procedure of information sharing will enhance, and a chance to streamline the procedure of healing will undoubtedly be obtained (LOGIQC, 2016).
Hypothesis and Objectives
The proposed study will aim at the discussion of the impact of accreditation and quality tools on patient safety. The study question could be: while accreditation is normally associated only with particular conditions and written standards, how do its effectiveness be viewed used? The hypothesis will undoubtedly be: accreditation for hospitals includes a positive influence on the grade of provided services and patient safety since it improves the machine by managing risks, reducing costs, and planning efficient service delivery. Because of the selected hypothesis, the analysis will focus on the next objectives:
To discuss the study objectives, a qualitative study will undoubtedly be developed. It will contain two parts. The initial one is a literature review that presents what healthcare scholars revealed in previous studies concerning the impact of hospital accreditation on patient safety and quality of care. The next part depends on interviews with healthcare professionals (mainly hospital management since they cope with the implementation of changes and control the procedure of accreditation, making them probably the most knowledgeable population). Open-ended and closed questions will undoubtedly be asked to recognize their perception of accreditation and its own influences. An opportunistic sample will undoubtedly be used to attain those professionals who consent to participate in the analysis. The data will undoubtedly be collected once. The duration of the interviews will never be limited unless the sample faces too little spare time. Communication will undoubtedly be managed face-to-face or by using e-mails/Skype/phone, with respect to the participants’ preferences and abilities. The obtained information will undoubtedly be recorded and analysed. The info collection process is likely to last for 1-2 weeks.
To be able to ensure participants’ anonymity, their private information will never be revealed. The sample will participate voluntarily so their responses will tend to be reliable. Moreover, they’ll be provided with basic information regarding research, including its purpose and objectives.
The findings of the proposed study will be distributed to the representatives of the healthcare sphere during conferences. Moreover, this article that discusses the analysis will undoubtedly be published. Its online version will undoubtedly be available aswell.
The proposed research is likely to benefit the sphere of healthcare since it focuses on the chance to improve the standard of provided services and patient safety used by making use of written standards. The impact of accreditation on these elements will undoubtedly be discussed in detail, that is critical because currently, these details lacks discussion. Because of this study, healthcare professionals will realise the need of accreditation, that will affect their practice and benefit patients.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in HEALTHCARE. (2017). National safety and quality health service standards . Web.
Brubakk, K., Vist, G., Bukholm, G., Barach, P., & Tjomsland, O. (2015). A systematic overview of hospital accreditation: The challenges of measuring complex intervention effects. BMC Health Services Research, 15 (1), 280.
LOGIQC. (2016). Manage safety, quality and risk in healthcare . Web.
Nussman, H. (2014). TJC vs. DNV: Which is right for you personally? Web.
Smith, H., Supachutikul, A., & Mate, K. (2014). Hospital accreditation: Lessons from low- and middle-income countries. Globalization and Health, 10 (1), 65.